an obsession....
hi. my name is honeyfields and i have a problem...i'm obsessed with this laura k. krishna story. :)
here's an article about that case from inside higher ed. apparently the spokesperson of the university cited federal laws about student privacy instead of denying that it happened at their school...so at least that's some indicator against this being a hoax.
i don't know if this really is a hoax or not. if it is, i would be disappointed, but still entertained. if it isn't, i think it's great that people are talking about this seriously.
it's pretty interesting to see how people respond to the situation and others. and really.... how few people actually READ the posts before blogging or just reading the comments instead of the actual posts. and the people that call them on it. :) some people actually thought that the girl's real name was laura k. krishna who had to write a paper on karma.
i found this particularly ironic after reading an excerpt from harry g. frankfurt's essay on "alternate possibilities and moral responsibility." i ordered the book because the moral issues and standpoints he brought up were interesting (you may be more familiar with his essay "on bullshit" which is also included in that book). and then, in a later conversation, metamanda sent me a link to this story.
the story is interesting, but the comments are quite a fascinating look into people's idea of mercy, accountability, vindictiveness and just plain ol' morals.
my current running theory for the people who are defending Ms. Krishna is that they are either guilty of having plagiarized, haven't written anything of worth to be plagiarized, have no idea that plagiarism means....
or the most fascinating to me right now... the group who seem to want to secure a more merciful society by showing mercy to wrongdoers now. it's as though they fear that the masses can one day turn on them and therefore, this wrong must be excused so that future possible wrongs (maybe theirs) will not be faced with such ruthlessness. it makes sense on a evolutionary/social/developmental level that compassion would rule over rules for some, but it's still fascinating to see them defend culpable people that would ultimately make their ideal society a less desirable place to be.
someone went as far as to say they'd rather live in a world of lauras (the plagiarist) than a world of nates (the writer of the blog). and someone had to point out that they'd rather deal with snarky truth than dishonesty.
i think it's an odd situation where people are placing themselves in laura's position for whatever motivations....guilt, cupability, being socially mocked in the past, etc... and losing sight of the true situation at hand. and once again... the serious lack of reading of the actual posts are quite astounding, really.
i think it's fairly clear where i stand on this.
after all...stealing of words is still stealing. and i think people have a hard time grasping the idea that there are actual people who make money and livelihoods from their ideas and words.



